By Muhimbise George
The decision to hold Parliamentary sittings in various regions across the country, starting with the North, has sparked significant debate. Some opposition leaders led by the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament, have criticized this move, branding it as a wasteful expenditure. They have even vowed to boycott these sessions, arguing that the funds could be better spent elsewhere, and that the issues to be discussed could just as effectively be addressed in Kampala.
However, these criticisms fail to consider the broader benefits of decentralizing Parliamentary sittings, both for Parliament as an institution and for the nation as a whole. Let’s delve deeper into why these regional sittings are not only justified but also essential.
Critics argue that the money allocated for these sittings could be redirected to other pressing needs, such as improving schools or healthcare facilities. While this argument may appear sound on the surface, it is illogical. Parliament operates under a budget, managed by the Parliamentary Commission as approved by Parliament. Suggesting that these funds be diverted elsewhere is not only impractical but also illegal.
It is also worth noting that if these regional sittings do not occur, the allocated funds will not magically be redirected to other sectors. Instead, they will be used for other Parliamentary activities, which may not have the same impact or visibility. Therefore, the argument that these funds could be better utilized elsewhere is not only misplaced but also undermines the importance of Parliament’s outreach and engagement with the broader public.
Holding Parliamentary sittings in the regions serves as an outreach program, bringing Parliament closer to the people it represents. By holding sessions outside of Kampala, Parliamentarians gain firsthand experience of the unique challenges faced by different regions. This proximity allows for a more informed and context-specific discussion of issues that might otherwise be overshadowed in a centrally located sitting.
Moreover, these sittings provide an invaluable opportunity to focus on region-specific concerns that often get lost in the broader national agenda. For instance, issues pertinent to the North might not receive the same level of attention in Kampala-based sittings. By holding sessions in the North, Parliament ensures that these issues are brought to the forefront, debated extensively, and addressed appropriately.
The decentralization of Parliamentary sittings also plays a critical role in nation-building. Historically, Uganda has benefited from policies that promote cross-regional interactions, such as the UPC regime’s practice of sending students from one region to study in another. This fostered a sense of national unity and helped break down regional barriers. Similarly, when MPs from Kigezi experience life in Gulu, or those from Mbale engage with communities in Mbarara, it promotes mutual understanding and strengthens the bonds of national cohesion.
One of the recurring challenges in Ugandan politics is the disconnect between Parliament and the electorate. Many Ugandans don’t understand the roles and responsibilities of their MPs, partly because they do not follow Parliamentary proceedings. By taking Parliament to the regions, we bring the institution closer to the people, demystifying its functions and enhancing public awareness. The increased media coverage of these regional sittings will undoubtedly contribute to a more informed citizenry, who are better equipped to hold their representatives accountable.
Finally, the economic impact of these regional sittings cannot be overstated. Although some have claimed that Parliament will spend up to 5 billion UGX per sitting, this expenditure should be viewed as an investment in the local economy. If such a sum were spent in Gulu, for example, the ripple effects would be significant. Local businesses, including hotels, lodges, restaurants, and fuel stations, would all benefit, injecting much-needed capital into the region. This kind of economic stimulus is particularly important for regions that often feel neglected.
In conclusion, the decision to hold Parliamentary sittings in the regions is not just a logistical shift but a strategic move that aligns with the broader goals of national unity, public engagement, and regional development. Far from being a wasteful exercise, it is a necessary step in ensuring that Parliament remains connected to the people it serves and responsive to the diverse needs of Uganda’s regions. These sittings should not only be supported but expanded further to ensure that every corner of the country feels the presence and influence of its legislators.
Muhimbise George,
muhimbiseg@gmail.com, 0787836515
